Index Volume four Six essays
The Companion Notebook emblem The Companion Notebook Essays on the characters who travel with you

Listed in the order written, which is also the order in which each game came back out of the drawer.

All essays, volume four

All six Full recall Partial Animal and machine Ensembles
A campsite with one empty bedroll at blue hour
Essay 02

The Empty Bedroll And What It Is For

Thirty hours of a camp laying out two beds for one person, and the moment the game finally explains itself without saying anything.

36 hours 2 companions Recall: full

Four companions arguing over a map in a candlelit tavern
Essay 04

The Argument At The Table Nobody Wins

An ensemble that disagrees and is never made to agree. Four names remembered, and the quest they were arguing about entirely gone.

52 hours 4 companions Recall: 4 of 4

An armoured figure on a ferry at dawn with an animal companion at their feet
Essay 05

The Animal That Sleeps On Your Boot

No combat role, no upgrades, no dialogue. A companion whose entire function is proximity, and why that was enough.

29 hours 1 companion Recall: full

A sleeping scholar in a caravan while a traveller tends the stove
Essay 06

Somebody Has To Bank The Stove

The companion who is always asleep, the chore the game never mentions, and a partial recall that took us a while to understand.

34 hours 3 companions Recall: partial

The three games that produced nothing

Nine games were finished for this volume and six essays came out of them. It seems worth saying what happened to the other three, because the silence is informative.

One was a large, well-reviewed adventure with a party of six, none of whom any of us could name after twelve months. We could produce roles — the medic, the pilot, the one who betrays you — but not a single name, habit or scene. Writing an essay about an absence that complete would have required more speculation than we are comfortable with.

The second had exactly one companion, extremely well written, who we all remembered perfectly and about whom there was nothing to say beyond that. Good writing recalled as good writing is not an argument; it is a compliment.

The third we simply disagreed about so completely that no shared account survived, and this journal does not publish essays that only one of us can defend.