The Companion Who Waits At The Top Of The Ridge
Eleven pauses on a mountain path, recalled a year later with an error of one. An argument that a habit outlives a plot.
41 hours 1 companion Recall: full
The Companion Notebook
Essays on the characters who travel with you
Listed in the order written, which is also the order in which each game came back out of the drawer.
Eleven pauses on a mountain path, recalled a year later with an error of one. An argument that a habit outlives a plot.
41 hours 1 companion Recall: full
Thirty hours of a camp laying out two beds for one person, and the moment the game finally explains itself without saying anything.
36 hours 2 companions Recall: full
Twenty-two hours, zero lines of dialogue, and the highest attachment score recorded in four volumes of doing this.
22 hours 1 companion Recall: full
An ensemble that disagrees and is never made to agree. Four names remembered, and the quest they were arguing about entirely gone.
52 hours 4 companions Recall: 4 of 4
No combat role, no upgrades, no dialogue. A companion whose entire function is proximity, and why that was enough.
29 hours 1 companion Recall: full
The companion who is always asleep, the chore the game never mentions, and a partial recall that took us a while to understand.
34 hours 3 companions Recall: partial
Nine games were finished for this volume and six essays came out of them. It seems worth saying what happened to the other three, because the silence is informative.
One was a large, well-reviewed adventure with a party of six, none of whom any of us could name after twelve months. We could produce roles — the medic, the pilot, the one who betrays you — but not a single name, habit or scene. Writing an essay about an absence that complete would have required more speculation than we are comfortable with.
The second had exactly one companion, extremely well written, who we all remembered perfectly and about whom there was nothing to say beyond that. Good writing recalled as good writing is not an argument; it is a compliment.
The third we simply disagreed about so completely that no shared account survived, and this journal does not publish essays that only one of us can defend.